Badges? We don’ nid no STINKIN’ badges!
So imagine you were just arrested by a foreign government for something you didn’t do. You were in the wrong place at the wrong time - these things happen. You get arrested and put in prison and your family is not notified and you think, “Hey, I didn’t do this!” and so you want to appeal to a judge. But when you express this desire to your jailer he just laughs at you. “Appeal to a judge,” he chuckles, “that’s a good one,” and he slams the door.
Four years later, you’re still in prison, and you still didn’t do it.
As an American, you should be shocked and appalled. One of the greatest traditions of Western law has just been violated: habeas corpus, the right prisoners have had, since the Magna Carta, to appeal an unjust imprisonment. This is the part of the blog where I normally start ripping into Cuba, but unfortunately, depending on a Senate vote on the so-called “compromise” bill to deal with terrorists, it is US law that could be amended with the following text:
`(e)(1) No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of an alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.
`(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (10 U.S.C. 801 note), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any other action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States and has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.’.
(b) Effective Date- The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to all cases, without exception, pending on or after the date of the enactment of this Act which relate to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of detention of an alien detained by the United States since September 11, 2001.
Basically, it says if we’ve gotcha, sorry, you’re fucked. Not only that, but this is retroactive, so if we got you before and fucked you, you’re still fucked, and we’re not even sorry for shipping you off to Syria where you were tortured, or holding you without trial for several years of your life.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is part of the so-called “compromise” between the Bush People and the Other People (full text). It is indeed a compromise: It compromises our international standing as a decent country, and compromises our troops’ safety should they fall into enemy hands.
As an American, I’m not really happy with this. Unfortunately, most of the House of Representatives was (including 34 Democrats) so they merrily voted to make it law. Today, we await the Senate’s decision.
This is bad. Very, very, very bad…
UPDATE: The Senate has rejected a change to the bill that would have taken out the suspension of habeas corpus part. This is very, very bad.
D. Greene wrote:
Charles Krauthammer on Fox News (yeah, I know, neocon deacon on the right wing news channel, whatever), pointed out that Nazi saboteurs caught in the United States in World War II were tried by military tribunals and executed. Just thought I’d mention that.
Posted on 30-Sep-06 at 3:35 pm | Permalink
pjk wrote:
Yeah, what he didn’t point out is that FDR basically single-handedly created the concept of “illegal enemy combatant” in order to do that. because those german sabateurs didn’t actually DO anything, they just talked about doing it, he had to basically invent a new piece of law (military tribunals) that would allow him to push his agenda… FDR, remember him? the conservative arch-nemesis? so basically, the “conservatives” are taking advantage of a piece of sketchy legislation rammed through by someone they used to profess to hate. bet they didn’t mention that on Fox News. we live in strange times.
Posted on 30-Sep-06 at 5:02 pm | Permalink
August. wrote:
On the flip side, there’s this.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/9/29/165813/514
Not that I think it’s worth it, I suppose, but, uh, it is.
Posted on 06-Oct-06 at 3:11 am | Permalink
August. wrote:
By “is” of course, I mean that the changes have happened, but at least there’s something somewhat useful that can be done with them in the interim.
Posted on 06-Oct-06 at 3:24 am | Permalink
Kevin Bowden wrote:
But do you think Hillary and Nancy will try to repeal this when they have the power, pretty soon?
Somehow, I think it’s with us till the SCOTUS gets around to it in a few years.
Sorry foreigners! You’d better hope John Roberts is libertarian. If not, reread the end of Krupa’s post.
Posted on 07-Oct-06 at 3:16 am | Permalink
Peter Krupa » Donald Vance wrote:
[…] You might recall a recent bill that passed Congress suspending habeas corpus for “enemy combatants,” a chillingly vague catagory. Mr. Vance wasn’t labeled an “enemy combatant,” but the justification was that he was “deemed a threat.” If that’s a good enough reason for the US government to start denying American citizens their legal rights, we have a serious problem here. […]
Posted on 18-Dec-06 at 8:44 am | Permalink