The End Is (No Where) Near!
“Picture show,” is the headline on Garrison Keiller’s latest column in Salon.com. The sub-head reads: “The camera can turn callow teens into celebrities and make Bush look like a pilot. Are photo ops ruining America?”
The answer is “no,” so I won’t bother reading the article. Why be so presumptuous? Because it’s just another in the long line of “Is X ruining America?” stories, and “X,” whatever it turns out to be, is almost never ruining America (or Western society, or the Youth, or whatever other cherished group/institution you can dream up).
Nevertheless, according to our punditocracy humanity is always perched on the brink of some precipice or other of cultural annihilation. These days it’s usually illegal drugs or gay marriage or MySpace, and in the past it’s been anything from video games to ultimate fighting to booze. No matter the dire predictions, we’re generally all still here once the dust clears, and life, as it has a way of doing, goes on.
As for why social critics are drawn to this kind of “the-end-is-near” journalism, my guess is that our approach to the future has something to do with our perception of the past. The modern mind is trained to think of history as punctuated by dramatic moments and urged along by small ripples that become a tsunami.
Thus we have the assassination of Prince Ferdinand, Black Tuesday, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and 9/11 to punctuate history, while we think of the Bolshevik Revolution, the Romantic poets, Elvis, and the invention of the assembly line as ripples that ended up causing a global flood.
What journalist wouldn’t want to be the one credited with having put a finger on the Next Big Thing? Of course, like any good seer, the journalist’s strategy is to predict a whole bunch of Next Big Things, then only remember the predictions that were right. Thus we have a glut of “X is destroying America” stories, in the hope that “X” turns out to be the next crack epidemic, or the next acid rain.
Most likely, however, no one ever does manage to predict the Next Big Thing. That’s part of why it’s the Next Big Thing. If the thing that will destroy society is so obvious that a columnist for Salon.com can pick it out, it’s doubtful it will make it very far. No, the thing that destroys our society will be a total surprise.
So when you die with your helper robot’s spindly fingers wrapped around your throat, don’t blame Garrison Keiller. Likely he’s just as surprised as you are.
daniel silliman wrote:
I think it’s that we’re apocalyptic. We know the apocalypse has begun, we just aren’t quite sure what it is. This explains all sorts of things about America.
Posted on 27-Sep-06 at 10:52 pm | Permalink
Zach wrote:
Next week’s column for Salon.com:
An attack on honest journalism: Is peterkrupa.com ruining America?
Posted on 28-Sep-06 at 6:33 am | Permalink
gauche wrote:
One of the messages I really liked in Bowling for Columbine was that in large part it’s our fear of a ruined America, stoked daily by news reports of isolated incidents of violence, depravity, and general not-nice-ness, that makes us distrustful, violent, and un-neighborly.
i.e., stories about how X is ruining America, are ruining America.
Posted on 28-Sep-06 at 6:50 am | Permalink
pjk wrote:
dan, I agree with you as far as human desire to talk about The End, but I think the journalistic motivation fits into the larger catagory of the trend story.
that said, in a bizarre combination of the two ideas, New York magazine has a story this week about the growing popularity of the apacalypse since 9/11 (the writer was apparently not around for Y2K)
Posted on 28-Sep-06 at 6:51 am | Permalink
John wrote:
ooh, spindly robot fingers…
Posted on 28-Sep-06 at 5:08 pm | Permalink
daniel silliman wrote:
Even if I agreed with you that humans and journalists are different sorts of things, I could never accept that Garison Keilor is a journalist.
Posted on 28-Sep-06 at 11:11 pm | Permalink