In which I add myself to a certain watch list…
At the risk of destroying any chance I might have of winning public office in the near future: Can someone please tell me why Americans spend so much time worrying about terrorism? I’m really impressed how often the topic comes up in all sorts of contexts in U.S. discourse, despite the absence of a sustained pattern of terrorist attacks.
The State Department loves to label distasteful governments/groups - Syria, FARC, North Korea - as “terrorist” or “state sponsors of terror” as if that somehow makes them ideological allies. Occasionally I run across chintzy action TV shows and movies where beefcake characters express their desire to go out and kill “terrorists,” as if such a status were self evident.
Meanwhile the Office of Motherland Homeland Security (tagline: Preserving Our Freedoms) spends billions of dollars every year on weird grants designed to defend against evil in terrorism hotspots like Annapolis, Maryland.
“Since 9/11, tourist areas are targeted by terrorists… ” Sgt. Johnson said. “Annapolis is the capital of Maryland. These days, I guess anything can happen anywhere.
Right! Except these days, nothing is happening anywhere! Spooks and State Department bureaucrats will tell us, hey, we’ve foiled tons of plots since 9/11, and you snot-nosed kids don’t even realize what kind of stuff has almost killed you in the last seven years.
But with the U.S. government’s track record, if hordes of terrorist boogymen really had been trying to blow up the Homeland since 9/11, at least one of them would have succeeded. Really, it can’t be that hard. Also, keep in mind that the people “protecting” us are the same ones who’ve been lying to us since the Mexican-American War, so frankly, I’m not buying it.
The truly interesting thing is how Cold War terminology has carried over into the 21st Century. The American imagination has been encouraged to think in terms of anti-Western “-isms.” Today we have simply flipped one “ideological” threat (communist, communism) for another one (terrorist, terrorism). Seriously, next time you hear a commentator or politician talking about the threat of “terrorism,” just insert the c-word. Suddenly, it’s 1962 all over again.
dave wrote:
I saw a bumper sticker today in the parking lot of my gym that said:
“Clinton + 8 years = 9/11″
Posted on 19-Jul-08 at 1:44 am | Permalink
John wrote:
From the NYTimes:
In Providence, the police have girded for an attack. Flush with Homeland Security money, the department bought a 27-foot patrol boat to monitor the city’s port, along with an automated underwater inspection and detection system and a portable small craft intrusion barrier.
At police headquarters, the department upgraded a video surveillance system, erected 159 concrete posts and 220 feet of guard rails around the building’s perimeter. Supposed targets for attacks, like rail and air terminals, have been inventoried and assessed, and in some cases, hardened against assaults.
The department acquired a small fleet of S.U.V.’s for emergency response, a bomb containment vehicle, a bomb response canine vehicle, mobile data terminals, scuba gear, trauma kits, underwater camera and video gear, and special protective suits for all officers. With a $5.6 million grant, the department is developing a sophisticated radio system so police, fire and other emergency responders throughout the region can communicate with one another.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/us/24terror.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&hp&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1216844061-c3jh9D6JlXks1KFxMe2HOA
Posted on 23-Jul-08 at 1:21 pm | Permalink