Don’t let this happen to you!
Let’s talk about birth control. Being a married, marginally-employed man living in close quarters with my student wife, having a baby is obviously not on our list of things to do at the moment, so birth control is a topic near and dear to my heart - like real estate for New Yorkers, or, in my family, firearms.
To the point: I love condoms.
I know, I know: condoms are for stopping disease. They’re for teenagers, or frat boys, or homosexuals giving each other the business in a state park. When you get married, you’re expected to be a responsible adult and start taking those pill thingies so you can go back to having sex the way God intended. Plus, pills are supposed to be more effective, clocking in at 99.something-something percent no-baby.
But there’s something about the concreteness of condoms that you have to admire. See, if she’s on the pill, you still can’t be sure - you could be in that point-something-something percent of “whoopses” because those little sperm definitely made it inside, and they’re swimming around, and who knows what they might find?
With a condom, on the other hand, you can hold up that little latex sack with confidence and say, “Sorry boys, not today!” Of course this always makes me think of Woody Allen in a sperm suit, which is not the most romantic of post-coital mental images, but at least it makes me chuckle.
This is the great thing about condoms. There’s no voodoo about them. It’s common-sense mechanics, and if you screw it up either you’re an idiot, or your condom stash was too far away from the kitchen table during the moment in question.
But there’s another angle to the condom issue. Guys reading this who are, ahem, knowledgeable, know that one reason we like the pill is that condoms tend to - how to put this - dampen sensation. We don’t want our wives on the pill because it gives them more control over their lives as women, but because we’re sick of wearing these freaking rubber things on our dicks all the time (plus we don’t want babies). Like the “Girls Gone Wild” video series, the pill is another element of female empowerment that men applaud for their own reasons.
So why am I against it? Hey, more sensation, what’s not to like?
The thing is - and I don’t know how many other people have noticed this - the pill can make women, well, crazy. Not crazy like put-her-in-a-straight-jacket, but crazy like who-is-this-woman-I-married? Every woman reacts differently to it, sure, and different pills work better for different people, but a casual survey of my various acquaintances over the years tells me I’m not alone in my observations. The pill can cause stomach problems, weight gain, libido drops, mood swings, disgruntledness, etc. etc.
I’m not being scientific about this, I know, but I don’t trust science to gauge the normalcy of my wife’s personality, or that of any other woman, for that matter. The bottom line is that the pill changes who people are - possibly not negatively, and probably not in everyone, but it’s an effect that I see talked about very little.
So it’s condoms for me, and campfire horror stories about tiny holes be damned. It’s nothing the morning-after pill won’t be able to fix. Although I have to admit, I am sort of looking forward to the man pill. As long as it doesn’t, you know, grow me breasts, or give me hot flashes.
Maybe I’ll give them a few years to work out the kinks.
neill wrote:
If you think that regular hormonal birth control can lead to mood swings (and it does), it bears mentioning that the Morning After pill does that times, roughly, a gazillion. Bad times.
Posted on 03-Dec-06 at 9:08 am | Permalink
pjk wrote:
which is why the morning after pill, like that donut in the trunk of your car, is to be used only in emergencies.
Posted on 03-Dec-06 at 10:59 am | Permalink
daniel silliman wrote:
Doesnt the morning after pill only work for a short period? For shorter a period than it would take to realize your condomn wasn’t working?
Posted on 03-Dec-06 at 7:05 pm | Permalink
neill wrote:
Of course. My point is that it’s not obvious whether a little inconsistency from standard birth control or the emotional apocalypse from Plan B “cleaning up” after a condom failure is more palatable.
Daniel– It’s a 72 hour window to start the treatment, although doctors always recommend taking the first (of two) dosages within a couple of hours of the event.
Posted on 03-Dec-06 at 7:42 pm | Permalink
Zach wrote:
I am so freaked out by Neill right now.
Posted on 04-Dec-06 at 5:36 pm | Permalink
Tom wrote:
I’ve read about these expensive lambskin (seriously, real freaking lambskin) condoms that practically feel the same as going “bareback”. If sensation’s an issue, just buy thin.
Oh, and btw, the NuvaRing is about the coolest birth control method on the planet.
Posted on 04-Dec-06 at 8:06 pm | Permalink
pjk wrote:
tom, I will give that a try. but they’re not lambskin. even better: they’re lamb INTESTINE. oh the silky smoothness…
Posted on 05-Dec-06 at 2:21 pm | Permalink
Bob wrote:
Nuvaring is, without a doubt, the best hormone based chemical birth control. The side effects are way less, you can’t forget a pill, a guy can, ahh, check and feel the ring, you name it.
There’s cool new male birthcontrol options out there, espicially RISUG. I eagerly await a future where men have more options.
Posted on 06-Dec-06 at 12:19 am | Permalink
Peter Krupa » Prophylactics, take two wrote:
[…] But a recent conversation encouraged me to believe just the opposite- that lambskin condoms were the closest one could get to “going bareback” and gave an exceptionally natural feel. Is it possible, I wondered, that a 2,000-year-old technology made from an animal product could trump modern technology? Not being one for empty speculation, I decided to try them myself. […]
Posted on 17-Dec-06 at 8:14 pm | Permalink