<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fuel cells are not an energy source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/02/25/fuel-cells-are-not-an-energy-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/02/25/fuel-cells-are-not-an-energy-source/</link>
	<description>An eclectic blog for talented people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/02/25/fuel-cells-are-not-an-energy-source/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrupa.com/?p=368#comment-244</guid>
		<description>&quot;hey need input from a conventional energy source to operate, be it natural gas, electricity produced by coal-fueled power plants, or magical pixie gas from your backyard compost pile.&quot;

I&#039;m one of the senior reps for Pixie Gas, Inc. We&#039;re an LPG alternative fuel conversion company and we agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;hey need input from a conventional energy source to operate, be it natural gas, electricity produced by coal-fueled power plants, or magical pixie gas from your backyard compost pile.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m one of the senior reps for Pixie Gas, Inc. We&#8217;re an LPG alternative fuel conversion company and we agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjk</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/02/25/fuel-cells-are-not-an-energy-source/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>pjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrupa.com/?p=368#comment-241</guid>
		<description>hehe, good point. from what I understand, its emissions will be lower than a generator, and it&#039;ll probably be more efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, good point. from what I understand, its emissions will be lower than a generator, and it&#8217;ll probably be more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hoyt</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/02/25/fuel-cells-are-not-an-energy-source/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrupa.com/?p=368#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t the bloombox be more akin to an electrical generator? 

The generator I can go to the store now and buy draws in oxygen and gasoline/diesel/natural gas and then uses combustion to drive an electrical generator. It then emits carbon dioxide/ other gases as waste.

The bloombox sends air and fuel across these composite blocks (cells) which then output electricity. I&#039;m not sure what the emissions are.

Maybe I&#039;m an idiot here, but that sounds like a closer comparison than to a rechargeable battery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the bloombox be more akin to an electrical generator? </p>
<p>The generator I can go to the store now and buy draws in oxygen and gasoline/diesel/natural gas and then uses combustion to drive an electrical generator. It then emits carbon dioxide/ other gases as waste.</p>
<p>The bloombox sends air and fuel across these composite blocks (cells) which then output electricity. I&#8217;m not sure what the emissions are.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m an idiot here, but that sounds like a closer comparison than to a rechargeable battery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
