<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not so fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/01/26/not-so-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/01/26/not-so-fast/</link>
	<description>An eclectic blog for talented people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pjk</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/01/26/not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>pjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrupa.com/?p=314#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Hi Sam! Thanks for your comment. I did, in fact, poke around the site quite a bit, specifically looking at your Latin America articles, as that&#039;s a part of the world I live in and follow pretty closely. Frankly, it reminds me of the Global Post, where you&#039;ve got lots of correspondents, but they don&#039;t write all that much, so your coverage ends up being broad and shallow, which is basically what I get from Reuters and the AP on a daily basis. Here&#039;s a piece of friendly advice: No one&#039;s interested in reading about the whole world, but plenty of readers are interested in specific regions or countries. However, in order to get people like me to add you to my morning reading material, your coverage of those regions or countries has to have BOTH a unique angle AND lots of content. In that sense, I don&#039;t care how well-crafted and thoughtful the two articles per month you publish about Venezuela (for instance) are; odds are I&#039;ve already read something similar somewhere else. Of course, those articles might be great for the casual consumer of world news, but then you&#039;re competing with Google and Yahoo, which, you know, good luck. Anyway, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll keep doing what you&#039;re doing. I&#039;ll poke my head in once in awhile to see how it&#039;s going, and best of luck to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sam! Thanks for your comment. I did, in fact, poke around the site quite a bit, specifically looking at your Latin America articles, as that&#8217;s a part of the world I live in and follow pretty closely. Frankly, it reminds me of the Global Post, where you&#8217;ve got lots of correspondents, but they don&#8217;t write all that much, so your coverage ends up being broad and shallow, which is basically what I get from Reuters and the AP on a daily basis. Here&#8217;s a piece of friendly advice: No one&#8217;s interested in reading about the whole world, but plenty of readers are interested in specific regions or countries. However, in order to get people like me to add you to my morning reading material, your coverage of those regions or countries has to have BOTH a unique angle AND lots of content. In that sense, I don&#8217;t care how well-crafted and thoughtful the two articles per month you publish about Venezuela (for instance) are; odds are I&#8217;ve already read something similar somewhere else. Of course, those articles might be great for the casual consumer of world news, but then you&#8217;re competing with Google and Yahoo, which, you know, good luck. Anyway, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll keep doing what you&#8217;re doing. I&#8217;ll poke my head in once in awhile to see how it&#8217;s going, and best of luck to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrupa.com/2010/01/26/not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrupa.com/?p=314#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter,

I appreciate you writing about The Faster Times, but I don&#039;t think you&#039;ve really given the site a fair shot. First, I think if you spend some time reading through the site, you&#039;ll see that the quality of the writing and thinking is far better and more original than what you&#039;ll find on a typical blog. That&#039;s not to say that every post is a work of art, only that if you read enough, you&#039;ll see that our writers are turning out  very high quality work every day. Also, if you check out our world section, you&#039;ll see that we have correspondents stationed all over the world and that they&#039;re turning out pretty fascinating accounts of life in their respective countries. Considering that just about every major paper is cutting its for foreign reporting down, I think it&#039;s pretty exciting that we&#039;ve been able to put an operation like this together. We&#039;ll be doing something similar across the U.S. in the coming months. We&#039;re also rather idiosyncratic in our coverage -- see our baseball and philosophy or death or pro wrestling sections.  I could go on about how we&#039;re unique, but I do think it&#039;s fair to say that we haven&#039;t yet achieved two of our most important goals -- making real money for our writers and breaking news on a regular basis. Of course, the more money we make, the more we&#039;ll be able to spend on reporting.  I think that if we pull off the money and the reporting, we&#039;ll have really done something pretty exceptional and to that end, we&#039;re introducing a bunch of interesting experiments in the months ahead. We&#039;ve only been up and running for six months and we&#039;ve already developed quite a large readership.  I hope you&#039;ll keep reading and give us a shot. -Sam Apple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter,</p>
<p>I appreciate you writing about The Faster Times, but I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ve really given the site a fair shot. First, I think if you spend some time reading through the site, you&#8217;ll see that the quality of the writing and thinking is far better and more original than what you&#8217;ll find on a typical blog. That&#8217;s not to say that every post is a work of art, only that if you read enough, you&#8217;ll see that our writers are turning out  very high quality work every day. Also, if you check out our world section, you&#8217;ll see that we have correspondents stationed all over the world and that they&#8217;re turning out pretty fascinating accounts of life in their respective countries. Considering that just about every major paper is cutting its for foreign reporting down, I think it&#8217;s pretty exciting that we&#8217;ve been able to put an operation like this together. We&#8217;ll be doing something similar across the U.S. in the coming months. We&#8217;re also rather idiosyncratic in our coverage &#8212; see our baseball and philosophy or death or pro wrestling sections.  I could go on about how we&#8217;re unique, but I do think it&#8217;s fair to say that we haven&#8217;t yet achieved two of our most important goals &#8212; making real money for our writers and breaking news on a regular basis. Of course, the more money we make, the more we&#8217;ll be able to spend on reporting.  I think that if we pull off the money and the reporting, we&#8217;ll have really done something pretty exceptional and to that end, we&#8217;re introducing a bunch of interesting experiments in the months ahead. We&#8217;ve only been up and running for six months and we&#8217;ve already developed quite a large readership.  I hope you&#8217;ll keep reading and give us a shot. -Sam Apple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
